land-speed
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Speed Weeks, not Speed Week

To: <Askotto@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Speed Weeks, not Speed Week
From: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:49:21 -0700
Otto--
I'd vote for this one, though somewhat reluctantly.  In actuality I think
that already happens a lot.  Many times crew members are put in the driver's
seat after the car has set a record or done its best in the first few days.
But it's going to be awfully hard to tell the guy who is out for the first
time with a new car that he has to wait until Wednesday as he sits and
watches  thunderstorms gathering on Tuesday afternoon.
Ed
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Askotto@aol.com>
To: <land-speed@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 10:29 AM
Subject: Speed Weeks, not Speed Week


> OK, how about making the meet longer? Just a few days. Don't allow newbie
> licensing the first part of the meet. Let the heavy hitters and licensed
drivers
>  have at it when the course is good. Many leave when they set their
records.
> In  the last part of the meet, turn the newbies loose after things slow
down.
> This  would also spread out the lines at tech. Tech the newbies the day
before
> they  start running, say Wednesday.
> This way everybody still gets to run at Speed Weeks but it would spread
out
> the crowds.
> I think a third course just for test and tune without any timing lights is
> also feasible to lighten the loads at the starting lines.
> Otto




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>