On Wed, 12 Feb 1997 08:58:09 -0800 nolan penney <npenney@concentric.net>
writes:
>> I'm sure you would be relieved to learn that Chrysler was originally
>> going to call the Concorde (or was it the Cirrus?) a "300E", but
>decided
>> that the name would not garner much recognition.
>
>300E? Never heard of it. Is that like a 300z? :-)
>
See what I mean? No name recognition:-) Actually, some on this list
older than I may remember the "300" series of Chryslers that were land
yachts with major power plants under the hood. Lefendary in their own
way. I might have had the letter designation wrong, but I believe the
series went through "300F."
David Littlefield
Houston, TX
|