In a message dated 97-02-12 12:39:19 EST, you write:
<< > I'm sure you would be relieved to learn that Chrysler was originally
>> going to call the Concorde (or was it the Cirrus?) a "300E", but decided
>> that the name would not garner much recognition.
> 300E? Never heard of it. Is that like a 300z? >
All us ol' time gearheads recognize the Chrysler 300 moniker as a 60's GAWD
AWFUL fast version of the normaly staid big Chrysler.
Yeah, the Yuppies and such probably wouldn't connect the two, and there sure
ain't no comparison between a 65 300 and a Concorde!!!
Rick
|