mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Engine support rod

To: mgs@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: Engine support rod
From: "Eric Kutzli" <ekutzli@netins.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 13:18:29 -0500
>From: Ray Wygonik 
>

>I have a CB 74 B.  should it have the support rod Joe talks about below? 

Ray:
Yep, your 74 should have a "Restraint Rod" as Haynes calls it...my book
(copyright 1989) shows it on page 28 fig 1.4. Doesn't really give much
insight on installation. 

>From: Joe Short
>Subject: Engine support rod
>
>|While crawling under my '75 B I noticed that the rod the runs under the
>|transmission to the back of the bell housing was so loose, it was rattling
>|around. My Haynes refers to as an "Engine Support Rod" Is there a specific
>|procedure to tighten it up ? If so, what is it ? Also, it appears to be
>either
>|curved or bent, this might be to clear the bottom of the trans. But should
>it
>|be curved or straight ? My car is equipped with the OD trans, and it looks
>as
>|if a slight curve in the rod is necessary to clear the bottom of the trans.

Joe:
I tightened mine up until the rubber isolator bits compressed slightly and
the thing felt taught but not so tight as to defeat the vibration damping
effect of the mountings. The picture (Fig1.29 page 52) in the engine
installation section of Haynes appears to be the earlier version called a
"Stay rod" which is somewhat different than the 74 version. I don't have
overdrive but the restraint rod on my CB 74 car is straight. Maybe a past
encounter with road debris has bent it? It is the little strap from the
transmission crossmember that attaches to the exhaust that I have a hard
time keeping attached!

Good Luck

Eric K
1974 MGB "Maggie"
1991 Capri "Matilda"
----------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>