mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic

To: "Charley & Peggy Robinson" <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Subject: Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic
From: "Neil Cotty" <neilc@apphosting.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:35:19 -0000
Charley,

I can't really answer this as I know nothing about them myself, but I am
guessing it is because the Ignition control computer needs the
weights/springs taken out of the equation for it to be able to do it's
stuff. Some one else will surely answer this one for us! <G>

Cheers,
Neil
----- Original Message -----
From: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
To: Neil Cotty <neilc@apphosting.com>
Cc: 'MG Mail list' <mgs@autox.team.net>; <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: Pertronix vs Mallory Magnetic


> Hi Neil,
>
>   Why do you have to lock out the mech advance?  I'm mystified on that
> one.  Pertronix unit goes in the spot where the points go.  Er, in your
> case where one of the two sets goes.  So installing the Pert shouldn't
> affect the advance mechanisms.
>
>   Cheers,
>
>   CR

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>