OK you all want some performance -- Ill dump some gas down the carb of my
(currently being replaced) V8 Vette engined +4 4 seater (+8???) and we will
see who can go straight faster! (before the body disengages from the frame)
Maybe I should forget the TR3 engine Art Hart and Myself loaded into the
back of My truck yesterday!!!!
--Scott
(1956 +4 4seat - 350CID, 4 spd, Independant suspended 10 bolt positrac etc.
etc. etc)
Scott Seidler
Senior Network Engineer
Eastern DataComm
44 Commerce Way
Hackensack, NJ 07601
voice: 201-457-3311
fax: 201-457-1811
email: sseidler@easterndatacomm.com
Web Site: http://home.att.net/~annie.seidler
----- Original Message -----
From: Vandergraaf, Chuck <vandergraaft@aecl.ca>
To: 'Lannis' <ottoflick@netzero.net>
Cc: <morgans@autox.team.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: "Charged" Triumphs
> Lannis,
>
> To me, this is all academic. My +4 is awaiting restoration. At the
moment,
> I'm preparing a pair of final exams to give to my students next Monday
and,
> at any rate, right now my +4 would not be any nimbler with a Ford or Fiat
> engine than it is with its heavy ex-Ferguson tractor engine. But, hey,
it's
> Morgan, with a flat rad, no less.
>
> Chuck Vandergraaf
> Pinawa, MB
>
> > ----------
> > From: Lannis[SMTP:ottoflick@netzero.net]
> > Reply To: Lannis
> > Sent: Saturday, December 11, 1999 2:47 PM
> > To: morgans@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: "Charged" Triumphs
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> >
> > >We're not regressing to that +4 vs. 4/4 thread are we?????
> > >Keep in mind that a Morgan's a Morgan, three wheels or four, 2, 4, (6?)
> > or
> > 8
> > >cyl.
> > > Cheers & Happy Morganing,
> > > Jim Nichol
> > > '28 Aero
> > > '64 +4 4 pl.
> > >
> >
> > Gee, I thought we were PROgressing in singing the praises of the
> > lightweight
> > dance partner of the Morgan line.
> >
> > How come it's the guys who don't have a 4/4 that never want to talk
about
> > how much more nimble and all-over well-balanced the 4/4 is as opposed to
> > the
> > tank-engined +4 or the aero-engined +8s? Not that I'm a partisan, mind.
> >
> > But I agree that we ought not get involved in any micturition contest
> > about
> > the specifics of WHY they're neater, quicker in turns, and easier to get
> > parts for. No sir, this ol' boy don't want to be the one stirring up
> > hate
> > and discontent among the Mog Fraternity just because my model is the
best
> > value for my BritCar buck......
> >
> > Lannis
> > '66 4/4 (oops, gave myself away!)
> >
|