Pssst, yes Rob, he's kidding.
> ----------
> From: rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com[SMTP:rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com]
> Reply To: rjj0msj@ix.netcom.com
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 1999 8:57 AM
> To: KENTRHONDA@aol.com
> Cc: oletrucks@autox.team.net
> Subject: Re: [oletrucks] (no subject)
>
> On Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:36:15 EST, you wrote:
>
> >Have a chance to buy a 52 3100 w/89,000 orig miles. 1 owner, truck is
> >partially restored. Guy wants $1,750.00. Is this a good deal. I also
> would
> >like to ask why is there hardly any info on 52's was this a bad year.
> This
> >will be my first project and would love to hear any info on the 52.
>
> Yes, it was a terrible year. I would not even consider buying that
> truck.
> However, maybe if you posted the guys number, we could all then know
> to avoid
> him and his truck. Better yet, email me his number privately so I can
> make sure
> I avoid him first!!!!
>
>
> :-)
>
> Are you kidding? That is a GREAT price if it is in decent shape and
> all there,
> and original?
>
> Give us more info, and NO, 1952 was NOT a bad year. Only thing I can
> think of
> to say about '52s, is that they were during the Korean war years, and
> therefore
> used less chrome.
>
> Rob
> >
> >Thanks all,
> >
> >Kent
> >oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and
> 1959
>
> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and
> 1959
>
|