oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] 64 Stovebolt for an AD?

To: <Hudson29@aol.com>, <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 64 Stovebolt for an AD?
From: "jack halton" <safesix@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 19:36:32 -0500
Paul,

    It's not the bolt-in that the 235 will be. Motor mounts and bellhousing
are the main difference.

    You don't mention size of the motor - if it's the 194 I6, don't bother.
A 230 or 250 would be worth the effort, though. I

Jack / Winter Park FL
-----Original Message-----
From: Hudson29@aol.com <Hudson29@aol.com>
To: oletrucks@autox.team.net <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Date: Monday, March 22, 1999 12:57 PM
Subject: [oletrucks] 64 Stovebolt for an AD?


> I have just got back from 4 days in Chicago to see the "Art Of The
>Motorcycle" at the Field Museum. The whole time I was in Chicago, I saw not
>one oletruck, wrecked, weathered or otherwise. The oldest truck I did see
was
>a mid seventies Ford! I guess anything older rusted years ago.
> On my desk Monday A.M., was an opportunity to buy a '64 Chevy car six
>cylinder and three speed in "good running condition" for only $50. Now I
just
>bought a good running '59 235, a few weeks ago for my AD, so this motor
would
>be a spare only. A question occurred to me that I had better find an answer
to
>PDQ as this is going to be a bang-bang deal. Will it fit? It seems to me
that
>somebody once said the later motors would NOT fit the ADs. Please e-mail me
>any replies as I have to decide today if I'll take it or not and I am on
the
>digest.
>
>Paul O'Neil,
>1951 Chevrolet 3600 Pickup Project, See it at:
>The Poor Man's Advanced Design Tech Tips Page
>http://home.earthlink.net/~conntest47/
>Fullerton, California USA
>Hudson29@aol.com
>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
>

oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>