spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: got another 69! (no LBC)

To: "nateley" <nateley@email.msn.com>
Subject: Re: got another 69! (no LBC)
From: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 10:44:39 -0500
Cc: "spridgets list" <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Reply-to: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>
Sender: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
So, if you bought it for $80 and sold it for $50 two years later, you took a
loss of 37.5%, which doesn't sound too good to me!  (hee-hee)

Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: nateley <nateley@email.msn.com>
To: spridget list <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Date: Thursday, December 23, 1999 9:06 AM
Subject: Re: got another 69! (no LBC)


>Jay, unfortunately, I could only get $50 for it - I had to sell it because
>everyone would refuse to ride in it - no sense of adventure.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <type79@ix.netcom.com>
>To: nateley <nateley@email.msn.com>
>Cc: spridget list <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 11:41 AM
>Subject: Re: got another 69! (no LBC)
>
>
>> Dave,
>> But how much did you sell it for after the 2 years? Did you take a loss?
>> Jay Fishbein
>>
>> nateley wrote:
>>
>> > Robert,
>> > My 66 Rumbler was one of the best cars I ever owned - paid $80 for it
>and
>> > drove it 2years,30k miles. It was uglier than a sh*t fence and had
>> > self-changing oil, but it refused to die. Have fun with it.
>> > Dave Camp
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Robert Weeks <lists@woozy.com>
>> > To: <Lancer7676@aol.com>; <lists@woozy.com>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>> > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 8:21 AM
>> > Subject: RE: got another 69! (no LBC)
>> >
>> > > Hey David,
>> > >
>> > > They were still making them in 69. Not quite a stylish as the late
>50's
>> > > early '60s ones, more like a Dodge Dart. I took a few photos last
>night
>> > and
>> > > threw them up on the web:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.woozy.com/rambler
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > There is an American Rambler Club devoted to the cars from 1958
>through
>> > > 1969, so I guess 69 was the last year.
>> > >
>> > > http://www.classicar.com/CLUBS/RAMBLER/RAMBLER.HTM
>> > >
>> > > I did some surfing around last night and I was amazed how much more
is
>out
>> > > there as far as parts, books, eaby listings,  etc., for our lbcs than
>a
>> > car
>> > > like this which had many more units sold and has a pretty devoted
>> > following.
>> > > We're really lucky in that respect.
>> > >
>> > > Happy Holidays,
>> > >
>> > > Robert
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: owner-spridgets@autox.team.net
>> > > [mailto:owner-spridgets@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of
Lancer7676@aol.com
>> > > Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:03 AM
>> > > To: lists@woozy.com; spridgets@autox.team.net
>> > > Subject: Re: got another 69! (no LBC)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > In a message dated 12/22/99 5:58:48 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>> > > lists@woozy.com
>> > > writes:
>> > >
>> > > << I just got a 1969 Rambler  >>
>> > >
>> > > Robert:
>> > >
>> > > A '69 Rambler???   I didn't know American Motors was still producing
>the
>> > > Rambler in 1969.  I had a 1968 Javelin (for which I traded my bought
>brand
>> > > new 1966 BJ8) and a 1970 AMX when they were new, but I thought they
>hadn't
>> > > made a Rambler since the early '60's.
>> > >
>> > > --David C.
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>