spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bypass tube on head

To: "Charles Christ" <cfchrist@earthlink.net>, <RBHouston@aol.com>, <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>, <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: bypass tube on head
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:35:54 -0700
References: <9e.773a467.26ae2ce9@aol.com> <002a01bff5b4$f5e04fa0$c9c4d63f@USER>
It would take a pretty small fan to mount on the inside of a Bugeye rad.
Very little room between the steering rack and the top of the rad...

Larry

----- Original Message -----
From "Charles Christ" <cfchrist at earthlink.net>
To: <RBHouston@aol.com>; <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: bypass tube on head


> rh is correct!  just ask the vintage race guys!  a puller not a pusher as
> far as fan location goes!
>
> chuck.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <RBHouston@aol.com>
> To: <grbyrns@ucdavis.edu>; <spridgets@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:36 PM
> Subject: Re: bypass tube on head
>
>
> > In a message dated 07/24/2000 2:49:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > grbyrns@ucdavis.edu writes:
> >
> > << Crossflow rad, no fan on WP, pusher elec
> >  thermo fan on front of radiator, thermostatically controlled oil
cooler.
> >>
> > For what it's worth, the TR guys swear the fan should be a puller on the
> > engine side of the radiator, or it will cut down on the airflow going
> > through.  And believe me, they discussed this down to the molecular
> > level...also discussing the need for the proper thermostat, and of
course
> > special Mercedes water, not distilled, for the radiator.
> >
> > RH
> >
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>