Wm,
Thanks. I guess we could run tests. We'll need five pre-RWA SWA, five
RWA, and five post-RWA SWA cars from listers. Please send them all to
Emory Eye Center, c/o Jeff Boatright. I promise to give them all back
when we're done and I'll even co-author you on the final report.
Jeff
At 1:48 PM -0600 11/6/00, Wm. Severin Thompson wrote:
>I suspect both. I did ask him the question...as the RWA looked so much
>better than the front and rear "fighting each other" in the original design
>(since they were designed by 2 separate teams and merged together...
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Jeff Boatright <jboatri@emory.edu>
>To: Wm. Severin Thompson <wsthompson@thicko.com>
>Cc: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 1:37 PM
>Subject: Re: another dumb newbie question
>
>
> > WST,
> >
> > Thanks, now I know- sort of. Was it that he thought it was
> > structurally weaker with real-world ramifications, or was it just a
> > standards issue that may or may not have had relevant consequences in
> > an accident?
> >
> > Jeff
> >
> > At 1:17 PM -0600 11/6/00, Wm. Severin Thompson wrote:
> > >According to Geoff Healey (yes, that Geoff, name dropper that I am...)
>there
> > >indeed was a measurable structural deficiency in the RWA for standards
> > >purposes...
> > >
> > >WST
> >
> >
> > _____________________________________________________________
> > Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
> > Assistant Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
> > Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis
> > mailto:jboatri@emory.edu
> >
_____________________________________________________________
Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis
mailto:jboatri@emory.edu
|