spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: another dumb newbie question

To: "Wm. Severin Thompson" <wsthompson@thicko.com>
Subject: Re: another dumb newbie question
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:37:43 -0500
Cc: spridgets@autox.team.net
References: <a6.b9a92c0.27383419@aol.com> <3A06EBDA.9076C1AD@core.com> <v0421010eb62cb14b2acd@[163.246.48.154]> <023701c04826$391f65d0$33786520@avid.com>
WST,

Thanks, now I know- sort of. Was it that he thought it was 
structurally weaker with real-world ramifications, or was it just a 
standards issue that may or may not have had relevant consequences in 
an accident?

Jeff

At 1:17 PM -0600 11/6/00, Wm. Severin Thompson wrote:
>According to Geoff Healey (yes, that Geoff, name dropper that I am...) there
>indeed was a measurable structural deficiency in the RWA for standards
>purposes...
>
>WST


_____________________________________________________________
Jeffrey H. Boatright, PhD
Assistant Professor, Emory Eye Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
Senior Editor, Molecular Vision, http://www.molvis.org/molvis
mailto:jboatri@emory.edu

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>