spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rubbish was Re: torque

To: Christian Stanton <cstanton@pixley.com>
Subject: Re: rubbish was Re: torque
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 17:26:04 -0800
Cc: Daniel1312@aol.com, spridgets@autox.team.net, macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu, Toby@intri-plex.com
Organization: WFO Racing
References: <sa12b762.039@pixley.com>
" Turbocharging (1st passenger turbo in 1978)"

Better rethink this one... A number of GM cars in the '60 were turbo cars.

Christian Stanton wrote:

> Too complicated....don't be too sure.
>
> Saab is has working prototypes (as in drivable cars) of a new variable 
>compression ratio engine.  The head (including cylinders) and block are hinged 
>and pivot hydraulically to continuously change the compression ratio from 8:1 
>to 14:1.
>
> Specs: 1.6 liter supercharged 5 cylinder 20 valve , 225 HP, 224 FtLb Torque, 
>40 (yes forty) lbs. max boost.
>
> See more at:
> http://www.edmunds.com/edweb/editorial/innovations/saabengine.html
>
> Leave it to Saab...they have had a few innovations (and flops):
> - Front wheel drive (how strange! since 1948)
> - 2 cycle cars (umm..you want me to add oil to the gas)
> - Freewheeling (for economy???)
> - Turbocharging (1st passenger turbo in 1978)
>
> MG Innovations:
> (umm...maybe the MGA Twin Cam or pre-war Supercharging?)
> ....
>
> Chris (MG,Saabs Beer or Wine? Different experience, still both great fun).  
>Is there a Turbo Midget in my future?
>
> >>> <Daniel1312@aol.com> 11/15/00 03:22PM >>>
> To be honest I think it will be cost of brass that will be prohibitive :>
>
> In a message dated 15/11/00 18:56:51 GMT Standard Time, Toby@intri-plex.com
> writes:
>
> << I can't wait until they try my
>  idea of a trombone exhaust system. It gets longer or shorter depending on
>  rpm to shock wave tune the exhaust system for every possible RPM!... Fun
>  crazy stuff. "Its too complicated it'll never work." >>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>