My wife thinks the TR3 is nice and even said that she would consider owning
one, which I'd be glad to find for her (note that I didn't say getting
involved with clubs, maintenance, etc.). I told her she'd have to learn to
operate a standard transmission first. She likes my Bugeye, from a
distance. She definately thinks of it as a toy. I'm working hard to turn
it into a real everyday car. I've got a line on a tach-drive generator that
I can swap my Lucas ACR16 alternator for. Then the little bugger should be
back on the road (and the tach will even work for the first time since I've
owned it).
Ryan
>From: GreenBugeye@aol.com
>Reply-To: GreenBugeye@aol.com
>To: Corry@iol.ie, spridgets@autox.team.net
>Subject: Re: TR2/3/3a Versus Sprite Mk.I
>Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:08:57 EST
>
>In a message dated 12/1/00 2:52:13 AM Eastern Standard Time, Corry@iol.ie
>writes:
>
> > IMHO, the TR2/3/3A are very close in looks with the Sprite Mk. I. Same
>style
> > headlight pods; same rear lights; smooth curved lines; same era
>manufacture,
> > with a beautiful dash. If I could, I would like to have a TR2/3/3A as a
> > standby
> > car. Hey, I sold some Sprite parts to a guy near Dublin Irl., who has
>that
> > Sprite
> > /TR3 combination, too.
> >
>
>I just knew I couldn't be the only one!
>
>Chris
>59 Bugeye
>59 TR3A
>71 Midget
>93 Audi S4 TQ
_____________________________________________________________________________________
|