its a size issue. The compression quality is not there in any other
format, wmv is much easier to compress then even DiVX ;-) and
repeatable every time.
On 11/5/05, Larry B. Macy, Ph.D. <macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu> wrote:
> That was better, but I gotta ask, why do people insist on posting
> video in .wmv format. It sucks. Try .mov the quality os better by
> far. I have a translator that changes wmv into mov and the video is
> just better, even after translating.
>
> Larry
>
> On Nov 4, 2005, at 9:06 PM, David Lieb wrote:
>
> > this one?
> > http://www.beatracing.com/roy/videos/compilations/RATG2004%20Flame%
> > 20Proof.wmv
> >
> >
> > Yup, THAT one ;-) A few sins along the way, but that happens when
> > you are young, etc.
> >
>
> --
>
> Larry Macy
> 78 Midget
>
> Keep your top down and your chin up.
>
> Larry B. Macy, Ph.D.
> macy@bbl.med.upenn.edu
> System Manager/Administrator
> Neuropsychiatry Section
> Department of Psychiatry
> University of Pennsylvania
> 3400 Spruce St. - 10 Gates
> Philadelphia, PA 19104
>
> Ask a question and you're a fool for three minutes; do not ask a
> question
> and you're a fool for the rest of your life.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.
>
> Your messages not reaching the list?
> Check out http://www.team.net/posting.html
|