Re: 1275 vs 1500 in a RB Midget

Oops, I thought I had read all the replies, but I missed Paul A's. At least
there is no shame in agreeing with Paul ;-)

> And yet another reason that I have heard is that, faced with the expense
of
> making two engines of similar application comply with the US emissions
> nonsense, BMC decided to standardize on the larger of the two. At least
the
> Spitlump fit in the Midget and we didn't just sit and watch them go to
> Canada like the Mini.
> David Lieb
> 1972 Midget