Hmmm! Maybe I fall into that category? I'm an ex-smoker. I wouldn't say
that I'm allergic and certainly not extremely allergic, but it sure isn't
pleasant for me.
I think they should do something or get off the pot. Either it's bad enough
that it should be banned. Or it's not and people should be able to choose.
Here, you can't smoke in restaurants and bars. If it's not illegal to smoke,
then why can't these restaurants and bars designate themselves 'smoking' or
'smoke free' and let them attract the kind of customers that they want? ( I
know it's not that simple. Employees and job conditions and all. )
Weather is 'spring like' here at the moment and thoughts of being able to do
something to the cars is setting in. In like a lamb?
Robert Duquette
Ottawa ON Canada
> From: dwramsey@att.net
>
> And I understand how you feel. My problem is the number of ex-smokers and
> non-smokers that are extremely allergic to second hand smoke. They tend to
> make me disbelieve any of them and unfairly the ones that really do suffer
> those problems.
> What really surprises me is it took until March for the guns and
> political stuff to make the list, got to assume that you all got your cars
> in top condition for spring and now have nothing better to do. Wish I could
> say the same for my boat.
> Crash
>
>
> Brad and All.
>
> I understand how you feel. They are valid points BUT.
>
> Now I can go out to dinner and maybe a movie. I'm one of those few with
> environmental
> allergies. My biggest problems are any smoke and most perfumes. Imagine!
>
> Thanks,
> Pete
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation $12.75
http://www.team.net/archive
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/spridgets
|