spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Spridgets] Rossi

To: Larry Daniels <ladaniels@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [Spridgets] Rossi
From: derf <derf247@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:22:22 -0600
Well, I'm a law abiding citizen and I have a suppressor.  It makes
shooting quieter, more pleasant.

Actually the more commonly used term to describe full auto weapons,
suppressors, SBRs, AOWs, etc. is "NFA item".
They are acquired through Class 3 FFL dealers and are regulated by the NFA.
If you google "class 3 items" you'll get more NFA type hits than you
would if you googled "title 2 items".
Title 2 is another term for NFA.  Class 3, NFA, and Title 2 are used
interchangeably by buyers and sellers of NFA items.


You may be right about the wording of the law but I doubt you can find
one precedent where someone was convicted of possessing a legal NFA
item while in company of the legal owner.

You probably cannot find one single incident of a legally possessed
NFA item being used in a crime.

You're right, no one "needs" a silencer.  No one "needs" a car.
Certainly no one needs more than one car, right?  No one "needs" to
drink alcohol.
What everyone needs is personal responsibility and integrity.
_______________________________________________

Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
Suggested annual donation  $12.75
Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
Forums: http://www.team.net/forums

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>