| To: | bradshaw@utdallas.edu, LeBrun@hii.hitachi.com, tigers@autox.team.net, |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :) |
| From: | HW200@aol.com |
| Date: | Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:43:27 -0500 (EST) |
I understand the Chevy Monza situation, my point is: How did Chevrolet and the dealerships represent the engine size to the consumer? Perhaps my 351ci substitition analogy in a modern Mustang is far fetched, but how would you feel if you were told you were getting one engine and you got another instead, wouldn't there be a huge liability issue present?- Hank |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 1967 MK II for Sale, Todd Rayson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), LeBrun |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), Harold Hartsell |
| Next by Thread: | Re[2]: that's _darn_ the torpedos :), LeBrun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |