tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[4]: The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and san

To: "Spontelli, Ramon" <rs11@ElSegundoCA.NCR.COM>, tigers@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re[4]: The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and san
From: nicholsj@oakwood.org
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 97 11:46:03 EST
     
     I hope you are joking about the attached note saying the tags have 
     non-original rivets.  If the TAC expert said that your Tigers are the 
     real thing based on their examination of characteristics only 
     bona-fide Tigers have, what is the point of  a note saying the tags 
     aren't held on by 'original rivets'?.  Does this note say if screws, 
     bolts, nuts etc. are original or not?  To TAC or not to TAC, that is 
     the question?
     
     
     Jeff 


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[2]: The trouble with TAC / Call for consensus and san
Author:  "Spontelli, Ramon" <rs11@ElSegundoCA.NCR.COM> at INTERNET
Date:    3/14/97 7:59 AM


     
>     As part of my long, ongoing restoration of my Tiger I took everything 
>    off the body (including the tags) when I sent it out to be stripped. 
 Since
>    I doubt that I will be able to find "original" rivets, does this mean 
that
>   my Tiger would not be able to pass TAC?
     
No, your Tiger would pass TAC.  They'd just put a note on your certificate 
of authenticity that the tags aren't attached by the original rivets.  They 
did both of mine that way.
     
Ramon


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>