| To: | TIGEROOTES@aol.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FW: Tigers United wishlist . . ./apology |
| From: | DJoh797014@aol.com |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:42:09 EDT |
Under my criteria, Algers are not considered Tigers because they were originally built as an Alpine. It is considered a very modified Alpine. Likewise, those Tigers that have been converted back to Alpines, are still considered Tigers. Dave Johnson |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tigers United wishlist . . ., Mark Meswarb |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | EN24 Fulcrum pin options, Derek White |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: FW: Tigers United wishlist . . ./apology, TIGEROOTES |
| Next by Thread: | Re: FW: Tigers United wishlist . . ./apology, PMUSS |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |