Steve
I have not read the article so I'm speaking in the blind.
It is very possible that some of this is coming from FORD; they are very
hard ass about infringement at this time.
Shelby might have a problem with some emblems but strip kits were FORD
parts; early Shelby's have painted strips until Ford took over production.
Some of the problem is reading someone's snippet of the situation
without having all the facts and if there is litigation involved there is
usually a gag order about telling the whole truth or any truth to anyone
except the judge in court. The best policy is to read, understand,
investigate then ask the right people questions; the right people are people
involved, not second hand information from an observer.
Ron Fraser
-----Original Message-----
From: steve wick [mailto:srwick@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:17 PM
To: rfraser@bluefrog.com; prbreuhan@hotmail.com; tigers@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: And while on the Subject of Clones...
I was only giving a brief rundown of the article. In the article it also
stated that companies
such as Tony Branda had Shelby licenses but that the license to sell certain
items such as
emblems, stripes, etc. were being pulled. I don't have the article in front
of me because
I left it at work so please find a copy and get the whole story. Everyone
sees something
different when they read an article like that, but the impression I got was
the writer and
those interviewed were not happy. I am merely a messenger. Steve
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date: 6/6/2006
|