I was only giving a brief rundown of the article. In the article it also
stated that companies
such as Tony Branda had Shelby licenses but that the license to sell certain
items such as
emblems, stripes, etc. were being pulled. I don't have the article in front
of me because
I left it at work so please find a copy and get the whole story. Everyone
sees something
different when they read an article like that, but the impression I got was
the writer and
those interviewed were not happy. I am merely a messenger.
Steve
>From: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
>Reply-To: <rfraser@bluefrog.com>
>To: "'steve wick'"
><srwick@hotmail.com>,<prbreuhan@hotmail.com>,<tigers@autox.team.net>
>Subject: RE: And while on the Subject of Clones...
>Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 20:38:27 -0400
>
>Steve
> Some of this is about ownership, copy write of the name Shelby,
>Cobra and whatever. He has to maintain vigil or the names go into the
>public domain. If he owns the name; then someone has to pay for a license
>to produce a product with that name on it. Its about business and about
>legal stuff.
>
> Some of this has to do with Carroll not wanting his name associated
>in any manner with some of the crap that has and is produced.
>
>Ron Fraser
|