tigers
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Tigers] Doane's Horses

To: Drmoonstone@aol.com
Subject: Re: [Tigers] Doane's Horses
From: Jeffrey Nichols <jxnichols@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 02:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
The quote "So are you getting 381 HP from your 260? I doubt it!"
is from your email of 6/16.  That is your statement, not mine. 
   
  Your statement says you cast doubt on getting 381 HP from a 260.  My response 
was speculation on Doane Spencer achieving 400 HP from a Ford 260 using modern 
engine parts because Doane was said to get 349 HP in 1965.   
   
   
   Believe me, I don't feel threatened by anything you say.  
   
   
                                              Jeff

Drmoonstone@aol.com wrote:
  
In a message dated 6/16/08 5:54:56 PM, jxnichols@sbcglobal.net writes:


  "So are you getting 381 HP from your 260? I doubt it!"


Yes, got it on the dyno! Feel free to call me a liar anytime. No lie, but I did 
bait everyone a little. Motor has a large arm, is bigger than 260, runs very 
high  compression and has custom made alu heads from Ford's F1 and Indy motor 
program, full roller valve train. Mr. Begosian was a chief developer on the J 
and K code motors. There really is nothing 260 about it anymore. The big gamble 
is can I cool it. Joe wants to put a spray bar in front of the radiator. Also 
drivability issues are still a concern!

So why do you feel so threatened by this?

A similar combination of components used on a 302 has produced 475hp and is 
currently in a really fast Mustang running in the Central Valley.

Moonstone


**************
Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007) 
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net  http://www.team.net/donate.html


Tigers@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/tigers

http://www.team.net/archive

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>