Phillip S. Osborne wrote:
> Guess you didn't attend the Solo 2 Nationals in the past 4 years where they
> paid folks who were involved in the Super Solo program down to 40th
> position....
> That in itself is unheard of from ANY sponsor, let alone any other auto
> marque. My question to you and a few others who have blasted DC for their
> pull-out is, why the sour grapes? Name another sponsor who has put so much
> into an amateur sport and received so little...
>
> And just because they are pursuing another venue doesn't necessarily mean
> that is the reason they pulled out of SCCA stuff. We all KNOW whey they did
> it, and who can blame them...
I'll add: Just because they are persuing another venue doesn't
necessarily mean that they aren't coming back either. Most folks who
have listened and understand the real reasoning behind this move support
DC. It was, and can still be, a good deal for the sport and everyone
involved.
PLW
|