autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-80 or I-70, least amount of constructi

To: "Greg" <greno@sunflower.com>, "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>,
Subject: Re: I-80 or I-70, least amount of constructi
From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 14:58:06 -0500
I just came through the KC-Topeka run down the Kansas Turnpike (which is
I-70 in that section). Ran it both ways.

It did not seem much worse than usual. Greater PITA between Topeka and
Salina (there's one pretty long zone, but still not last year's 17-miler,
and a couple of quickies). IMHO, I'd rather spend 15 minutes in the
construction zones than go two hours out of my way (I-80 to Omaha and then
south).

In fact, some of the stretches are quite nice.  They are the "other side" of
the highway reconstruction begun last year, which means we are now driving
on the new pavement.

I drove them in something of a state of distraction -- my dad died a week
ago in San Francisco and I went to KC to catch a plane -- and even then it
did not strike me as difficult. I was able to zip thru most of the zones at
the allowable 60 per.

--Rocky

-----Original Message-----
From: Greg <greno@sunflower.com>
To: Ron Bauer <ronbauer@aa.net>; autocross digest <autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, September 01, 2000 6:42 AM
Subject: Re: I-80 or I-70, least amount of constructi


>I live in Lawrence and commute to Topeka via I-70 daily. As well as the
>occasional drive west of Topeka. All I have to say about the entire state
of
>Kansas' road construction, is be patient. They tear up the whole state at
>once. As an example there is about 60miles between KC & Topeka, which is
>heavily traveled by commuters, with about 4 different sets of road
>construction. It is about the same out west as well. From about Salina to
>Topeka (120miles) is about the same way. Lots of one lane in each
direction.
>Sorry no good news.
>Greg Reno
>Mazda MX-3 GS V6
>#36 ES
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>
>To: "Murray, Matthew D." <MDMURRAY@gwns.com>; "Teamdotnet"
><autox@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 9:24 PM
>Subject: Re: I-80 or I-70, least amount of constructi
>
>
>> Also, the same information coming from the west would be good too!
>>
>> Ron Bauer
>> Y2K S2K
>> Team Butt Heat
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Murray, Matthew D. <MDMURRAY@gwns.com>
>> To: Teamdotnet <autox@autox.team.net>
>> Date: Thursday, August 31, 2000 2:21 PM
>> Subject: I-80 or I-70, least amount of constructi
>>
>>
>> >I've heard that I-70 has more construction than usual. Does anyone who
>> >traverses this on a regular basis, know if I-80 is any better?
>> >
>> >This would be Connecticut to Kansas.
>> >
>> >Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> >Matt Murray
>> >
>> >mattm@optonline.net
>> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>