RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs)

To:	<autox@autox.team.net>
Subject:	RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs)
From:	"Bill Fuhrmann" <bfuhrman@isd.net>
Date:	Sat, 4 Nov 2000 10:17:18 -0600

> So as of today, a 92-93 968 would not be permitted, and a 94 has one year
> left. Am I missing something? :^)

Only how someone can think that it isn't a STUPID idea to disenfranchise a
large share of the base of the sport.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Matt Murray RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Michael McAvoy Re: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Charles R. Schultz Re: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Jamie Houk RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Jeff Lloyd RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Bill Fuhrmann <= Re: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Matt Murray Re: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Jester097

Previous by Date:	RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Jeff Lloyd
Next by Date:	RE: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Bill Fuhrmann
Previous by Thread:	RE: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Jeff Lloyd
Next by Thread:	Re: Seven year rule, was: Stock Classing (was: Marque Clubs), Matt Murray
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]