fot
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: re:SCCA cages

To: "greg" <gtlund@cyberspeedway.net>, "FOT LIST" <fot@Autox.Team.Net>
Subject: Re: re:SCCA cages
From: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:34:51 -0500
BRAVO!

You echo my philosophy -- this is the members' club not the officials', so
the official's prime purpose should be to make things happen for the
members.

Within reason, of course -- preventing an unsafe/illegal car from competing
is making things happen for the members in the safe/legal cars.

But if we can help him get safe, or legal, all the better.

--Rocky Entriken

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "greg" <gtlund@cyberspeedway.net>
To: "FOT LIST" <fot@Autox.Team.Net>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: re:SCCA cages


>      Dave blew my cover. Yes I am a dreaded tech inspecter but I started
> doing this to try to rescue tech from the dark side. I have seen some of
> the mistakes tech has made over the years. SCCA is focusing on their
> tech training to make tech inspectors more knowledgable and more
> consistent so if your car passes at one venue it will pass anywhere. In
> the past there has been a feeling that SCCA tech just looks for a reason
> to keep you off the track. The new approach is to try and find a way to
> get the car and driver out on the track. Bill Pachardo nationally and
> Mike Higgins locally have been a great help to SCCA tech to push this
> user friendly philosophy.
> Greg Lund

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>