fot
[Top] [All Lists]

[Fot] Trouble with Porterfield Brake Pads

Subject: [Fot] Trouble with Porterfield Brake Pads
From: william.tobin31 at verizon.net (Bill Tobin)
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 20:51:48 -0500
References: <CACZdCPXM-BEj2p2-P8d+acF+_hzNYN=RqGNmcHdu2y9k=p7FCg@mail.gmail.com>
Love the Porterfields, never had a problem.
Did somewhere along the line someone switch calipers? I know some are 3/16 and 
some 1/4 holes.
I drilled out all my spares to 1/4 inch, all the same size. Less spares to 
carry.
Be careful with calipers, the P and PB use a slightly different mounting bolt. 
Memory escapes me as to the particulars.
Good luck.
Bill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Brad Eells via Fot 
  To: fot 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2018 7:21 PM
  Subject: [Fot] Trouble with Porterfield Brake Pads


  Hello Amici,


  Porterfield brake pads in the R4-1 compound were recommended to me. I 
dutifully ordered a set for my Spitfire.


  I should mention the car has been upgraded to GT6 brake calipers, the 
venerable Girling 16P. My TR4 and 4A also use the 16P. I have been buying brake 
pads for these cars for over 35 years.


  I have had my calipers rebuilt and purchased new retaining pins as well. The 
Porterfield pads arrived. I found 2 issues. The pad compound shape was not the 
same as every pad I have previously purchased or what is shown on Porterfield's 
website. I also found the retaining pin holes in the puck to be too small. The 
puck itself is the same general dimension as my original Girling Competition 
pad and does fit in the caliper but I cannot put the pins through the holes.


  I simply assumed they had sent pads for the later GT6, the Girling 16PB or 
M16PB that use 3/16" retaining pins.


  8 Emails with manager, Wendy and 1 phone call with engineer Tim and we still 
have a disagreement. I was told they had sold that exact pad "for 25 years" for 
my application and no one had ever had a problem or complained. When I asked 
why I couldn't simply have what was shown on their website as the pad for the 
16P, I was told that was just a general illustration and not correct for any 
specific application.


  They have offered to drill out the retaining pin holes to fit my pins. I am 
honestly disappointed that I simply can't have what fits out of the box and to 
have to argue the point back and forth through multiple Emails and a terse 
phone call.


  So, my questions to those of you running a 16P (late TR3 through early TR6 
and GT6 1968-72 along with many other British applications) are:


  1. Are you using Porterfield pads in your calipers?


  2. Have you found them to fit the standard 1/4" retaining pin?


  3. If you have found them to not fit the pins, are you drilling them out 
yourself?


  4. Does the difference in pad shape concern you at all (photo attached)?


  5. If not Porterfield, then what are you using? Without divulging any speed 
secrets, of course...


  I'm close enough to their facility that I can appear there with my pins, pads 
and calipers to prove what they disbelieve...it just shouldn't have to come to 
that with a reputable company from my view...


  Your thoughts and experience are appreciated.






  ??



  Thanks!




  Brad Eells
  Chino CA
  #35 DP 1962 Triumph TR4
  #76 FP 1969 Triumph Spitfire Mk3
  1965 Triumph TR4A IRS...for the road!




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  fot at autox.team.net

  http://www.fot-racing.com

  Donate: http://www.team.net/donate.html
  Archive: http://www.team.net/archive
  Forums: http://www.team.net/forums
  Unsubscribe/Manage: http://autox.team.net/mailman/options/fot/william.tobin31 
at verizon.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180307/b8cc7eb3/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ap1142008_03_24_10_51_45.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4824 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180307/b8cc7eb3/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: IMG_2858.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1988087 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: 
<http://autox.team.net/pipermail/fot/attachments/20180307/b8cc7eb3/attachment-0003.jpg>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>