--===============0513477181==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OK, I forwarded this to the List (with Wayne's permission), so I'll
chime in.
I read this as they built the original engine twice--with County
bearings--and had
problems. The third build was the spare engine.
Nonetheless, your data is noted--the original engine could have had
bottom end
issues the spare engine (third build) didn't.
Anyone else have experience with County parts?
bs
david porter wrote:
> I gotta chime in on this one. I've re-built hundreds of bottom ends and have
> been using the County bearings for many of them (being a loyal Moss Dist.)
> Bearings simply do not slide apart. That requires friction and resultant
> heat. I suspect that on the 3rd go around your friend finally did (or
> re-did) the machine shop work that the bottom end required in the first
> place.
> Dave
>
>
>
>
***************************************************************
Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net
'67 Austin-Healey 3000 '56 Austin-Healey 100M
***************************************************************
--===============0513477181==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
--===============0513477181==--
|