I've seen a lot of replacement VIN plates with the plate itself like original,
but the stamping so crudely done that it's laughable. It's always obvious that
they are replacements, and it always makes me wonder if the number is correct.
In most cases where I've been able to investigate that, it isn't.
There is BJ8 in a museum in Sweden with a replacement VIN plate that is nicely
and professionally done. However, it's not original, since it has a "-" after
HBJ8L rather than the standard factory-applied "/". Also (I have photos of
this car's firewall), it has the original body number plate from a car 8,035
chassis numbers higher than what's on the VIN plate - only 115 cars from the
end of production.
My recommendation would be to have any replacement plate done by a professional
like Todd Clarke who knows what he is doing, otherwise it's pretty easy to tell
the plate isn't original.
Steve Byers
HBJ8L/36666
BJ8 Registry
Havelock, NC USA
---- glemon@neb.rr.com wrote:
> Years ago when I was redoing a TR4A a misplaced the VIN plate and ordered a
>new one from Moss or VB, don't remember which, took it down to a trophy shop
>(engraving) to have the correct number on it.
>
> At the time is struck me how easy it would be to "create" a car with a
>particular VIN if you were so inclined. I think it is good that Clarke asks
>for proof of car ownership, but I think you can get at least some of the ID
>plates from the usual sources and I am fairly certain they don't ask for any
>documentation.
>
> Greg Lemon
> 54 BN1
_______________________________________________
Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html
Healeys@autox.team.net
http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/healeys
|