To: | mgs <mgs@Autox.Team.Net> |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: Engine weights/was how about a real V8! |
From: | The Richards <smrm@coastalnet.com> |
Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 1997 20:55:19 -0500 |
At 08:37 PM 9/23/97 -0400, you wrote: > power of 145bhp compared to the MGB's 95bhp, output per liter > was less than the smaller engine - and the last Austin-Healy > 3000 had developed 150bhp." What are the relative torque figures? That's where from the low end grunt emerges. Michael, New Bern, NC 67 MGB, never met a curve it didn't like...well, that one with all the sand on it excepted. 74 Interceptor, the elegant application of massive torque. The Land-Rover, it does all the real work. |
Previous by Date: | Re: Time to put the engine/tranny in the "A", Skip Kelsey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | 76 MG-B, HGlenBetts |
Previous by Thread: | RE: Engine weights/was how about a real V8!, larry.g.unger |
Next by Thread: | RE: Engine weights/was how about a real V8!, larry.g.unger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |