mgs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Fugliest MGB Award

To: "'Gordon Bird'" <gobird@vbe.com>, REwald9535@aol.com,
Subject: RE: Fugliest MGB Award
From: Hans Duinhoven <H.Duinhoven@simac.nl>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:56:43 +0200
one word: disgusting pictures

Hans 

'71 BGT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Bird [SMTP:gobird@vbe.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 1999 2:42 PM
> To:   REwald9535@aol.com; kradick1@ic3.ithaca.edu; mgs@autox.team.net
> Subject:      Re: Fugliest MGB Award
> 
> A shame someone would do something like that to a rust free car!  We in
> the
> saltbelt lust after those rust free examples.
> Gordie
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <REwald9535@aol.com>
> To: <kradick1@ic3.ithaca.edu>; <mgs@autox.team.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 10:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Fugliest MGB Award
> 
> 
> > In a message dated 8/24/99 6:37:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > kradick1@ic3.ithaca.edu writes:
> >
> > > It is just hideous.  I'd almost consider giving my '66 MGB away to the
> > >  person who purchases that car in order for them to correct it and
> make
> it
> > >  look decent.
> >
> >
> > My suggestion would be to jack up the radiator cap and drive another MG
> under
> > the cap*
> > (* of course then a radiator cap replacement would be required)
> > A 1.4L engine with a slush box?  compared to the 66's non smog 1.8 it
> sounds
> > like a serious slug to me.  Also the quote about "Looks like a factory
> > installation"
> > What kind of factory?
> > Rick Ewald
> >

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>