nothing wrong with a spitfire engine. I have an mgb, and in the past several
triumphs and as it happens a jag, I imagine that from the perspective of a
early xj6 owner, If I followed your logic, I could consider an mg something
less than a real car.
----- Original Message -----
From: Florrie & Allen Bachelder <bachldrs@swva.net>
To: <mgs@autox.team.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 8:52 PM
Subject: Re: MG Decision to make
> >Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 23:19:14 -0500
> >From: Linda Gaubert <efg2@home.com>
> >To: BOB HILL <oldcars@newt.vallnet.com>
> >Subject: Re: MG Decision to make
> >
> >bob--
> >go with the GT.
> >First it is an MGB vs a Midget. No offense to anyone intended, but if a
> >Lincoln is available, why buy a Ford Taurus?
> >Second is the fact that the Midget is a 77, built during the twilight
> >years of MG, with big rubber bumpers increased ride height, reduced
> >HP...<<snip>>
>
> Not to mention the 77 Midget has a Triumph Spitfire engine...
>
> Allen
>
> ******************************************
> Allen H. Bachelder =iii=<
> Sinking Creek Home for Wayward MGs
> New Castle, VA 24127
> USA
> 540/544-7333
> ******************************************
>
>
|