oletrucks
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [oletrucks] 348 c.i.

To: "rock1" <rock1@austin.rr.com>,
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 348 c.i.
From: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:05:49 -0700
My brother in law has the speed item for the motor "the Multi Carburetors
with intake" just in case you decide to go that route.   No linkage but
that's available from various suppliers.

Joe Garcia
Yuba City, CA
1950 Chevrolet 3100

http://chevy1.freeservers.com/
http://50chevy.freeservers.com/
http://1950Jeepster.freeservers.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: rock1 <rock1@austin.rr.com>
To: Edward T. Dingo <cen36932@centuryinter.net>
Cc: oletrucks@autox.team.net <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 348 c.i.


>Thanks for all the information guys! Have been struggling with the decision
>of putting out the money to rebuild it and put it in my 55, when I get to
>that stage. Right now the cab is on 4 jack stands in my garage, so it will
>be awhile. I found parts to rebuild, I estimate it will cost about 1500
>dollars to complete. A little pricey for a stock engine, but those valve
>covers Haunt Me! How unique it would be.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Edward T. Dingo" <cen36932@centuryinter.net>
>To: "rock1" <rock1@austin.rr.com>
>Cc: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 3:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [oletrucks] 348 c.i.
>
>
>> Had 1 in the first car I ever owned, a 1960 Bel Air. Engine ran
>flawlessly;
>> however went thru a few turbo-glide (not power-glide) transmissions.
These
>> engines are way heavier than traditional small-blocks, and not as many
>speed
>> parts available for them. Believe there was machining difference between
>this
>> breed of V8 and small block in head/block area. Angle, or something,
>different
>> from the "norm". Hope this helps. Did love the look of those chrome valve
>covers
>> though. Big, sorta scalloped. Man, this is going waaay back in the
>recesses of
>> my mind!
>>
>> Ed in Mich.
>> '57 3100
>>
>> rock1 wrote:
>>
>> > Does anyone out there know anything about the 348 c.i. chevy engine.
Was
>it
>> > a reliable motor? Would it be worth rebuilding and putting in my 55
>second
>> > series? Is it worth anything? Thanks.
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: <Passnb4U@aol.com>
>> > To: <oletrucks@autox.team.net>
>> > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2000 8:27 AM
>> > Subject: [oletrucks] A reminder on replying to messages
>> >
>> > >
>> > >   Please use the "reply all" function or cut and paste
>> > > "oletrucks@autox.team.net" (without the "'s) to you "send".
>> > >
>> > >   This way everyone will get a chance to see your message/reply,
>unless of
>> > > course you wish to reply directly to the sender only.
>> > >
>> > >   Mike
>> > > oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and
>1959
>> >
>> > oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
>>
>> oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
>
>oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
>


oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>