Mark,
I guess it depends on a number of things. I have not seen how the anti
sway bar is mounted, so I don't know the dynamics of it. I spoke to
someone who said he has one (don't know if it is addco) and he was
unimpressed with its performance because it restricted the action of the
springs and made for an awfully rough ride. This is probably not
important in a true race car, but certainly worth considering on a
street car.
The design of the camber compensator is such that it does not interfere
with the spring action but rather transfers the force of the wheel
loading to the inside unloaded wheel and pushes it out so it stays in a
negative camber attitude. Coupled with a de-arched rear spring, and
some good Koni or Spax shocks, it makes for a good racing setup.
Send me a reply describing how the addco sway bat is mounted and I'll
compare it with my understanding of the camber compensator action and
give you my thoughts. Also what is the cost of this option?
Regards,
Joe
"Haynes, Mark" wrote:
>
> Joe- wouldn't the application of a rear anti-sway bar accomplish the same
> thing on a swing spring? We put an addco bar on the rear of our racer this
> winter, and it has greatly improved the balance of the car when put into a
> 'tail-out' situation. i.e. It no longer has the tendancy of over responding
> to inputs wwhen the tail starts to swing out, thus making it easier to
> control when pushed too hard.
> Mark Haynes
> '65 Spit Racer RMVR #162 (with a Swing Spring)
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joe Curry [SMTP:spitlist@gte.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 10:46 PM
> > To: david
> > Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net
> > Subject: Re: camber compensator
> >
> >
> > David,
> > There is a description on the URL:
> > http://home1.gte.net/spitlist/cambercompensator.htm
> >
> > But in short, the function is to prevent (or restrict) the tendency of
> > the inside rear wheel to tuck under in a hard turn. It does so by
> > providing a leaf spring attached to the bottom of the differential and
> > to the vertical links. When the loaded wheel is compressed it causes
> > the spring leaf to shift and exert downward pressure on the unloaded
> > wheel. This force is below the pivot point of the rear trunnion so it
> > is converter to outward pressure causing the wheel to be pushed outward,
> > retaining a negative camber attitude instead of tucking under.
> >
> > The nature of the swing spring makes it unsuitable for use with the
> > camber compensator, but if a fixed spring is substituted for the swing
> > spring and the camber compensator is installed, the result is a much
> > more stable rear suspension. That opinion is shared by Kas Kastner who
> > has generously counseled me in the creation of the above referenced URL.
> >
> > Check it out and see if that doesn't answer your questions. I expect to
> > have photos on the URL sometime in the next 1 to 2 weeks. I'm just
> > waiting for the remaining few pieces to be fabricated and it will be
> > ready to install.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Joe
> >
> > david wrote:
> > >
> > > How does this camber compensator I keep hearing about work? What
> > > does it consist of? Anyone have a picture of it or a schematic
> > > representation? How well does it work? Better in combination with a
> > > swing spring? Will an early spitfire flip if turned quickly in one
> > > direction or more? Or does it just (!) lose rear traction and
> > > spin/oversteer? Well, you get the drift of my thoughts. Who's got the
> > > lowdown on the rear suspension setup on spits?
> > >
> > > Thanks, David
> >
> > --
> > "If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
> > -- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
> >
--
"If you can't excel with talent, triumph with effort."
-- Dave Weinbaum in National Enquirer
|