spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Radios - and BC Licensing

To: "'Andrew Holmes'" <holmes_law@hotmail.com>,
Subject: RE: Radios - and BC Licensing
From: "Simmons, Reid W" <reid.w.simmons@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:23:51 -0700
Except for Ham Radio call letter license plates.  These MUST go with the
owner and not the car because the FCC issued those call letters to the
person, not the car.  This is true in any state that issues these plates.

Reid, K7YX
'79 Spitfire (original owner)




-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Holmes [mailto:holmes_law@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 12:28 PM
To: Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us
Cc: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Radios - and BC Licencing



With regard to license plates, California is different than many states.  In

California, the plates stay with the car as long as the registration for 
that car is continuous, regardless of who the different owners are or were.

I know that in many other states, the plates go with the owners, or are 
changed at each resale of the car.

What this means in California is that if a car has been continuously 
registered over the years, it may have the original plates, from the first 
sale of that car, still on it.  Like mine.



>From: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
>To: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>,        "'Andrew

>Holmes'" <holmes_law@hotmail.com>
>CC: spitfires@autox.team.net
>Subject: RE: Radios - and BC Licencing
>Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 15:18:03 -0400
>
>Try the California Dept. of Motor Vehicles ( or whatever they call it)
>webpage for details of each type of licensure.
>What do you mean by "black plated"?
>
> > ----------
> > From:       Andrew Holmes[SMTP:holmes_law@hotmail.com]
> > Sent:       Wednesday, April 12, 2000 3:02 PM
> > To:         Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us
> > Cc:         spitfires@autox.team.net
> > Subject:    RE: Radios - and BC Licencing
> >
> > Any California listers ever try to get historic/antique plates?  Any
> > advantages/disadvantages?
> >
> > My spit is a black-plated car, which is rare enough, but are there
> > advantages to the special plates?
> >
> > I guess the first question should be, does the spit qualify for 'em?
> >
> > Andrew Holmes
> > '66 mkII Spit
> >
> > >From: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
> > >Reply-To: "Banbury, Terrence" <Terrence.Banbury@dnr.state.oh.us>
> > >To: spitfires@autox.team.net, cplimey@home.com,
> > >"'Michael_Bayrock@translink.bc.ca'" <Michael_Bayrock@translink.bc.ca>
> > >Subject: RE: Radios - and BC Licencing
> > >Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 07:42:37 -0400
> > >
> > >If American citizens don't wake up soon, this type of regulation is not
> > far
> > >off in this country.
> > >
> > >Terrence N. Banbury
> > >1967 SPITFIRE MK III
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > ----------
> > > > From:
> > > > 
>Michael_Bayrock@translink.bc.ca[SMTP:Michael_Bayrock@translink.bc.ca]
> > > > Reply To:       Michael_Bayrock@translink.bc.ca
> > > > Sent:   Monday, April 10, 2000 5:30 PM
> > > > To:     spitfires@autox.team.net; cplimey@home.com
> > > > Subject:        RE: Radios - and BC Licencing
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Philip (and anyone else who's interested)
> > > >
> > > > If you haven't done so yet, give Ruth a call in ABC in Burnaby.  
>She's
> > > > worked in the industry longer than many of us have been alive, and
> > what
> > > > she
> > > > remembers is just amazing.  (what she doesn't remember isn't worth
> > > > knowing).
> > > > My suspicion, though, is that radios were dealer options at that 
>time,
> >
> > >and
> > > > dealer options are not acceptable to the collector plate program...
> > > >
> > > > For those of you who wonder why the gov't is interested in what 
>radio
> > >your
> > > > car has, it's got to do with the special program they instituted for
> > > > 'vehicles of collector status'.  Roughly, the rules are:
> > > > - must be more than 25 years old, or 15 years old and limited
> > production
> > > > - must be your 2nd vehicle
> > > > - can be used for pleasure purposes only (no to/from work travel
> > >allowed)
> > > > - must be bone stock as it came from the factory
> > > > - must be in very good condition.
> > > >
> > > > The bonus of fitting into these rules are:
> > > > - annual insurance rate of $250 vs. $1000+ for 'regular' vehicles
> > > > - permanent exemption from the local 'AirCare' emission control
> > testing
> > > >
> > > > The bone stock means just that - no aftermarket wheels, interiors,
> > roll
> > > > bars, radios, ... anything.  I'm sure that even a non-factory colour
> > >might
> > > > get you thrown out of the program. AND, the onus is on you to prove
> > that
> > > > the
> > > > items are or are not factory.
> > > >
> > > > Only in Canada, you say?...
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > > --------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 18:34:33 -0700
> > > > From: Philip Warburton <cplimey@home.com>
> > > > Subject: Original Radio
> > > >
> > > > Anybody know what kind of radio was installed/offered for a 1975 
>Spit?
> > > >
> > > > I need it (or something that will pass muster) in order to qualify 
>for
> > > > "Collector Plate" insurance here in sunny Vancouver B.C.
> > > > 19+ degrees C today.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Philip
> > > >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: Radios - and BC Licensing, Simmons, Reid W <=