spridgets
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: front bumber, Yes of No

To: <spridgets@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: front bumber, Yes of No
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 09:42:57 -0800charset="iso-8859-1"
References: <200003141718.JAA11441@shorter.eng.sun.com>
It was your car without the bumper this Sunday that brought the issue to my
attention.  I think they look better without them and will go that way with
mine.
Of course, I don't have a nicely chromed one sitting a corner to tempt me.

Glen Byrns
59 Bugeye
3 other crappy, no-fun, family cars

Bryan wrote:

> I pretty sure, bumper requirements in CA were not established until the
70's,
> (hence the rubber bumpered LBC's), and those laws are not retroactive to
cars
> manufactured before that time. For instance, take a look at all the
'custom
> cars' without a front bumper. In any case, I have never ever heard of
anyone in
> CA being sited for not having a front bumper on their car, in fact, rear
bumpers
> are still an 'option' on new pickups here, so I think you can rest easy.
> I do have the complete bumper assembly for my car, however, I haven't
gotten
> around to refinishing the mounting brackets yet, in addition, I do like
the way
> the car looks without it. Besides, if I did mount it, the first time I
scraped a
> curb, there goes my $100 chrome job.
>
>  - Bryan
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>