hey
How do we let Quentin know we strongly support him?
we need all the assistance we can get.
Gary Oehrle
> From triumphs-owner@autox.team.net Thu Dec 19 11:18:00 1996
> X-From: Umail1 Thu Dec 19 11:17 PST 1996
mail1.lsil.com with ESMTP id LAA06284
(8.6.12/IDA-1.6 for <oehrle@lsil.com>); Thu, 19 Dec 1996 11:17:33 -0800
> X-Authentication-Warning: triumph.cs.utah.edu: majordom set sender to
>owner-triumphs
using -f
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 1996 10:52:54 -0800
> From: kboetzer@auspex.com (Ken Boetzer)
> To: triumphs@autox.team.net, ingate@shiseis.com
> Subject: Re: Smog II in Cal, again. Sigh. (Good news!)
> Content-Md5: ZgcWSC7rohpZSLZE1YOCEw==
>
>
> > All,
> > Seems Quentin Kopp (a Sacramento weenie) is behind a measure
> > to return California smog laws to the way they were originally written,
> > with a rolling 25-year window. The first law took effect in 1981, which is
> > why cars 1966 and newer are tested. The next year it was supposed to be
> > 1967, then 1968, and so on, but bureaucrats being what they are, the 1966
> > date stuck. He's going to try to change it in '97, effective in '98,
>meaning
> > that only cars '73 and newer would be tested, and then within two years,
>we'd
> > (TR6 and older) never have to worry again.
> >
> > Anyone heard this?
> >
> > Shane Ingate in San Diego
> >
> Good morning,
>
> Yes I have heard this. Quentin is a San Francisco plitico (weenie) who I find
> myself agreeing with on an alrmingly large number of issues. I also agree this
> will address smog in a more rational fashion even though there are a
>substantial
> number of cars of the old variety. It seems the number driven regularly is low
> and as such not a significant contributor to the smog problem. Let's hope he
> is successful.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ken Boetzer
|