| To: | "triumphs@autox.team.net" <triumphs@Autox.Team.Net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: to EGR or not to EGR |
| From: | Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Aug 1997 17:52:47 -0400 |
| Organization: | BRIT Inc |
| References: | <882564F0.006FFC48.00@csc.com> |
dstauffa@csc.com wrote: > > I removed the EGR from my 1974 (early) tr6. This resulted in an increase > of 5 MPG's with no adverse effects in performance. Your EGR was broken. EGR helps mileage when it works, by filling the combustion chamber with inert exhaust instead of fuel-air when power is not needed. (deceleration, cruise, etc). Exhibit A. -- Trevor Boicey Ottawa, Canada tboicey@brit.ca http://www.brit.ca/~tboicey/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: TR6 thinks it has a radial engine, Henry Frye |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | GT6 headliner installation, Theis, Karl J |
| Previous by Thread: | to EGR or not to EGR, dstauffa |
| Next by Thread: | Re: to EGR or not to EGR, dstauffa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |