triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Rear main seal

To: triumphs@Autox.Team.Net, Joe Curry <curry@wolfenet.com>
Subject: Re: Rear main seal
From: Peter Ficklin <pficklin@qnis.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 1997 16:16:19 -0800
References: <01bcff8b$7b1768c0$648f82d1@merlin-cad> <3484E1E7.135D@wolfenet.com>
Joe Curry wrote:
<SNIP>
> Many of the earlier engines had those spirals in the rear of the
> crankshaft.  And it is correct that the motion of the crank pulls air
> from the rear of the engine through that channel keeping a positive
> suction on the rear of the engine and the oil inside (no mention here of
> other oil leaks).
> 
> Here is my experience with oil seals inserted in that type engine.  The
> engine in question is a 1147 cc Mk2 Spitfire engine (My son's).  When he
> bought the car, it literally poured oil out the back end.  Taking it
> apart revealed that some dpo had installed a makeshift later type oil
> seal in the rear of the engine.  A new gasket set, needless to say did
> not contain a rear seal and checking with British Parts Northwest I was
> advised that none is required.  That was verified by the Haynes manual
> that refers to it as a "scroll type oil seal".
> 
> After overhaul, the oil leak susbided substantually.
<UN-SNIP>

Joe, et al...
  When I rebuilt my 1147 motor, I had the scroll area on the crank
"spray welded", machined & polished, so that I could fit a 1500 Spit
seal plate with a standard lip seal.  Therefore, no leaks.  Works great! 

Peter Ficklin
'63 & '68 Spits

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>