triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: GENERATOR VS. ALTERNATOR

To: <TRIUMPHS@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: GENERATOR VS. ALTERNATOR
From: "Randall Young" <Ryoung@navcomtech.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:33:46 -0800
> TO ALL LISTERS, I AM TAKING A POLL ON HOW TRIUMPHS OWNERS FEEL ABOUT
> GENERATORS VS. ALTERNATORS ( APPLIES TO OLDER TRIUMPHS).IF ONE
> CONVERTS FROM A
> GENERATOR TO A ALTERNATOR, HE WILL GAIN A PRACTICAL CAR IN
> TODAY'S TRAFFIC, BUT ON
> THE OTHER HAND ARE THEY HURTING THE VALUES OF THEIR CAR(S) BY
> DOING SO?

WHY ARE YOU SHOUTING ?!

IMO, it depends.  If the car is otherwise a 90+ point restoration, then yes,
an alternator will probably hurt it's resale value.  OTOH, it should be
possible to do the conversion in a totally reversible fashion, so you could
have your alternator while driving the car, then when you're ready to sell,
put the generator back on (and sell the alternator conversion kit on eBay
<g>).

Randall
59 TR3A TS39781LO daily driver (alternator since 1985)
63 Sports 6 HB7826LCV rustoration project (original alternator)
71 Stag LE1473L daily driver wanna be (original generator)
57 TR3 TS21731L rusting quietly (original generator)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>