| To: | tr3driver@ca.rr.com, triumphs@autox.team.net |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TR] tr nos vs. repros. |
| From: | "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:39:53 -0800 |
> I think the main point here is that not all NOS parts are good, nor are > they all bad. Exactly my point. The "NOS" appellation is no guarantee of part quality, good or bad. Randall _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html This list supported in part by the Vintage Triumph Register http://www.vtr.org Triumphs@autox.team.net http://autox.team.net/mailman/listinfo/triumphs http://www.team.net/archive |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TR] tr nos vs. repros., TR250Driver |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TR] tr nos vs. repros., John Macartney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TR] tr nos vs. repros., TR250Driver |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TR] tr nos vs. repros., John Macartney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |