Mail Archive Search: <+from:JDMurphy47@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:JDMurphy47@aol.com: 57 ]

Total 57 documents matching your query.

1. Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:47:35 -0500; With Danny Shields' recent articles about this and several postings touching on this subject along with high speeds being obtained by high performance stock cars (like SS), it is now high time to pro; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00134.html (8,883 bytes)
2. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:59:47 EST; With all due respect: 1+ 5. This is not so much an issue of liking DOT slicks as looking long term at advancing technology and how it affects insurance risks. A separate temporary street tire stock; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00151.html (10,330 bytes)
3. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:07:16 EST; "from my cold dead hands" LOL !!! I like it! In my response to GH Sharp just posted, I mention the possibility of a transition period with a separate (sub-class?) of street tire stock classes - wort; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00152.html (9,603 bytes)
4. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:27:59 EST; Let's work on this to see how we can make the insurance people not come down on us with really too tight (ugh!) course designs to limit speed in the stock classes: 1. I do not know what car you have; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00155.html (10,366 bytes)
5. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:37:32 EST; Speed is what the insurance people are looking at. As the tire technology improves with better grip (chief example are the ST classes) the need for DOT slicks becomes unnecessary. I hope others on t; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00157.html (9,816 bytes)
6. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:15:26 EST; But the insurance companies can tell the SCCA to make it safer and what happens then?? One obvious way is to SLOW down the course by tightening it (I DO NOT want this). My proposal is to slow down ju; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00160.html (9,644 bytes)
7. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:22:37 -0500; Pro Solo and Solo are almost the same so I think Danny is well within his bounds and this topic does need to be resolved or the insurance guys are gonna get us. I also have no problem with space for; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00177.html (10,374 bytes)
8. Re: Street Tires in Stock Classes and Fewer Allowances (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 08:30:52 -0500; I am not saying to use the OEM tires - most of them are worthless. I am saying to use the same tires as being used in the Street Tire classes with great success and growing entries. I am told that th; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00178.html (11,829 bytes)
9. GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:36:12 -0500; How is slowing down "just the stock classes" going to keep the insurance companies happy? They won't care if there's an incident with a Prepared or Mod car as long as all the Stock cars are going slo; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00188.html (8,137 bytes)
10. Matt's question on Street tires (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:43:57 -0500; So let's say we go back to non-"R" tires in stock. Would we bring all the ST classes back to stock and remove that whole subset? Matt Murray Good question . . . . No, leave ST alone - it is a very go; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00189.html (7,576 bytes)
11. Re: Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:55:24 -0500; That question would need to be directed to HQ for the best answer - I do know that the premium has been going up. What we have been talking about here is the future of the sport and the insurance imp; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00191.html (6,932 bytes)
12. Re: GH's Question on Street Tires for Stock (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:13:15 -0500; 1. I have heard that Fedral tire regulations may tighten down on this wear rating. It can always be increased. 2. I have been told by the ST drivers that their tires last longer than the Kumhos so y; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00194.html (9,103 bytes)
13. Slowing down Stock class and insurance concerns (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:42:01 -0500; Okay, let's put together some of the ideas that have surfaced so far to help our insurance concerns in order of my preference: 1. Slow down the stock classes due to the technology improvements in sto; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00273.html (8,688 bytes)
14. Re: Slowing down Stock class and insurance concerns (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:11:23 -0500; Premiums have been going up so it is only a matter of time. Jim --Original Message-- From: MWood24020 To: JDMurphy47; autox@autox.team.net Sent: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 1:52:33 PM Eastern Standard Time Subj; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00275.html (7,556 bytes)
15. Re: Slowing down Stock class and insurance concerns (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:21:32 -0500; You can remind the regions all you want (until you are blue in the face) but until the course designers and safety stewards enforce this (along with the rest of the safety rules) 100% of the time the; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00279.html (8,334 bytes)
16. Stricter Sound Control at Ft. Myers NT (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:24:20 -0500; The sound control has been reduced from 95dB to 92dB and I suspect that a lot of cars that normally are not considered loud may not pass. The Prepared and Mod classes are used to this but not the res; /html/autox/2006-01/msg00015.html (6,735 bytes)
17. Peru NT on the Indy 500 Weekend!?!? (score: 1): Author: jdmurphy47@aol.com; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:04:50 -0500; I noticed awhile back that the 2006 Peru NT is no longer on the July 4th weekend that it has occupied for years - now Milwaukee has this date. The bad part of this is that it is now scheduled on Memo; /html/autox/2005-12/msg00040.html (7,421 bytes)
18. Fwd: Ray's Fatal Accident (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:23:08 EDT; Ray Yeo was a valued co-worker and friend of mine who lived in the Miami area. I would like to speak with any soloist in that area who might have known Ray as I understood from him that he was a SCCA; /html/autox/2005-04/msg00028.html (8,200 bytes)
19. New Time Trials Program (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:06:04 -0500; All of this was covered by Howard Duncan at our Southeast Meeting back in January. From this day forward we are Solo without the "2". I first noticed this awhile back with the Topeka Nationals being; /html/autox/2005-02/msg00051.html (7,249 bytes)
20. Tage Evanson, Co-Drivers and Fun (score: 1): Author: JDMurphy47@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:54:10 EST; I am glad to see Tage's name in your latest NAP issue and how he did out in Arizona. As you may have seen in the Topeka Nationals write-up in Sports Car how Tage became my co-driver in the most unus; /html/autox/2005-02/msg00124.html (7,853 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]