Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Stainless\s+Steel\s+Fuel\s+Tank\s+for\s+Big\s+Healeys\s*$/: 35 ]

Total 35 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Slechta" <mslechta@chartermi.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 09:17:40 -0500
Greg ~ I'll have to get some of that, just to have along when we're traveling. Fortunately, here in WI we still have quite a few stations that have ethanol-free fuel. You just have to know where to g
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00759.html (10,784 bytes)

22. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "Len and/or Marge Hartnett" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:52:51 -0700
According to the fuel-testers.com site, California requires a label on the pump for ethanol presence. I stopped by my nearest gas station which recently converted from a USA station to a Shell statio
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00767.html (10,795 bytes)

23. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Lemon" <glemon@neb.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:41:06 -0500
In Nebraska, ethanol, is required to be labeled, most stations have regular, a 87 octane, midgrade at 89, and premium at 91 or 92. The midgrade (called different names at different vendors, often "pl
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00768.html (9,025 bytes)

24. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:10:44 -0700
Have always heard the 'midrange' fuel is the low- and high-test blended (that's why it is usually 89-octane and the low is 87 and premium is 91). If the midrange is the only one labeled as containing
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00770.html (9,626 bytes)

25. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 10:20:33 +0200
In the Netherlands there are only 2 or 3 refineries. ALL brands big and small get their fuel from these. It even goes as far as trucks from Shell, Esso, Texaco, BP etc supplying other brands or each
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00003.html (7,685 bytes)

26. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "Mr. Bill" <bn1@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:35:57 -0700
With regard to performance, Len, you should have also mentioned that you received the award for best (smoothest) idle of all the Big Healeys at the 2010 Rendezvous in Eugene, OR. Not too shabby now t
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00774.html (11,565 bytes)

27. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "Len and/or Marge Hartnett" <thehartnetts@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 22:16:45 -0700
Thanks, Bill. I forgot about that. Senior Moment combined with Short Term Memory Loss. Although the matter of performance always comes up when people try to justify the use of premium gasoline in the
/html/healeys/2011-04/msg00779.html (9,908 bytes)

28. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 05:39:52 -0700
My Mustang will run on anything from 87-octane on up. The specs say I get 10ft-lbs more torque in the midrange if I run 91-octane or higher. It's pretty subjective--you'd have to put it on a dyno to
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00008.html (10,368 bytes)

29. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: "John Sims" <ahbn6@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 09:05:19 -0400
I doubt if anyone is testing the octane rating any more and with the computers controlling everything on a car nowdays it may not be necessary if the rating is off a point or two. That being said, In
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00009.html (9,686 bytes)

30. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 15:11:55 +0200
What is "top tier" fuel? Never heard of it in EU. Kees Oudesluijs [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of coudesluijs.vcf] _______________________________________
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00010.html (7,526 bytes)

31. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 16:10:21 +0200
What is "top tier" fuel? Never heard of it in EU. Kees Oudesluijs [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of coudesluijs.vcf] _______________________________________
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00013.html (7,486 bytes)

32. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 08:45:44 -0700
It's a) a legitimate effort to qualify fuel, b) marketing BS, c) both. I think it's all three. Bob -- ** Bob Spidell San Jose, CA bspidell@comcast.net ** ____________________________________________
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00016.html (8,400 bytes)

33. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 19:57:23 +0200
It is probably similar to e.g. BP excellium or whatever fancy names are given. The claims made are totally unproven and cannot be established. Many have often tried to research scientifically it but
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00019.html (8,313 bytes)

34. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Richard Ewald <richard.ewald@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:10:04 -0700
Did you read your link? Top tier is not an effort by the oil companies to make themselves look good, but rather an effort by the car companies to make sure they cars can and will stay in compliance
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00020.html (8,867 bytes)

35. Re: [Healeys] Stainless Steel Fuel Tank for Big Healeys (score: 1)
Author: Bob Spidell <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 14:03:51 -0700
Did you read my message? "http://www.toptiergas.com/ It's a) a legitimate effort to qualify fuel, b) marketing BS, c) both. I think it's all three. " Where did I say "an effort by the oil companies
/html/healeys/2011-05/msg00022.html (9,665 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu