Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:msirota@isc.upenn.edu: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Re: CM New thinking (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:30:56 -0400
Spec tires are already specifically not required for SR/SRF in Solo II in CM. Don't see why they'd be required for FF or Club Ford. Of course, if it were in the GCR, I might be more inclined. Mark //
/html/autox-cm/2001-07/msg00022.html (6,615 bytes)

2. Hoosier R25A (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 18:40:09 -0400
So what's the word on the new R25A compound from Hoosier? Dick, I hear you have some experience with them... Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/autox-cm/2001-06/msg00000.html (6,128 bytes)

3. 10/11 in CM at Ayer! (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:39:02 -0400
Thanks to two of our CENDIV compatriots, it looks like the turnout is up to 10 in CM at Ayer next weekend -- or is it 11? Where is Chessick's co-driver in #117? And two more in CML! That's the best T
/html/autox-cm/2001-06/msg00010.html (6,813 bytes)

4. Re: One less CM competitor (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:21:26 -0400
As it turned out, there were five fewer CM competitors than were originally listed. Not only did Kurt's tow vehicle break at the last minute, but Don Elzinga and Ray Thomas were actually registered f
/html/autox-cm/2001-06/msg00013.html (8,785 bytes)

5. Re: Looking for wheel lugs (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:39:50 -0400
Just so everyone knows, Tom Reichel pulls through as usual. He's got a source for these, just when everyone else says "dunno, never had to buy one before." Tom rules! Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team
/html/autox-cm/2001-06/msg00016.html (6,691 bytes)

6. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:17:25 -0400
I agree with you, Greg. It also seems counter to the preface of the class listing in Appendix A, which discusses the desire to prevent Solo-only Formula Fords. I'll write a letter. I'm surprised nobo
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00005.html (8,472 bytes)

7. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 22:23:26 -0400
Reverse is a fundamental part of the gearbox that comes installed in any Formula Ford. There are a few different common gearboxes, but they all include reverse, as reverse is required by the FF1600 r
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00007.html (8,423 bytes)

8. Re: Reverse (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:45:39 -0400
A maladjusted linkage (whether deliberate or not) doesn't bother me nearly as much as the opportunity to use a custom gearbox. Of course, that opportunity already exists, but at least it has to have
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00016.html (6,767 bytes)

9. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:13:54 -0400
My 914 had the same pattern, and a truly horrible linkage -- you didn't so much select a gear, you recommended one. Whenever Josh drove it, he used to say "start in first, go straight up to second, g
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00018.html (9,661 bytes)

10. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:01:55 -0400
Okay, that still is "disabling reverse" rather than removing the requirement. Asked and answered. Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00022.html (8,862 bytes)

11. Modified Category reverse gear proposal (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 19:07:50 -0400
Solo Events Board and Modified Advisory Committee members, I am writing to comment on the proposed new sections 16.2.P and 16.3.N, stating "Reverse gear is not required." I would like to propose movi
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00034.html (9,402 bytes)

12. Re: Modified Category reverse gear proposal (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:06:53 -0400
I agree that with the belts on and tight, I can't see a damn thing, and wouldn't try backing up unless I was really sure. But without the belts on, it's really easy to turn around and look behind you
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00036.html (7,388 bytes)

13. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 14:33:48 -0400
Well said, Charlie. Send a letter! Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00038.html (8,845 bytes)

14. Re: Proposed Rules Change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 17:38:31 -0400
I hope you don't mean that as an insult. So why include CM in the proposal? Anyone who thinks that all that will result is a 3 oz weight reduction is sticking their head in the sand. Strong competito
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00042.html (9,061 bytes)

15. Re: Fwd: RE: Proposed rule change (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:58:13 -0400
I'd copy Mac on this reply, but Greg didn't include his address. You guys just don't get it, do you? If the rule were written as proposed, people could get creative and it WOULDN'T BE CHEATING. The r
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00056.html (8,433 bytes)

16. Six-point harnesses (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 17:37:33 -0400
The harness I currently have in my car is from TRW Sabelt that I bought from Racer Wholesale in 1994. It clearly needs to be rewebbed or replaced. However, I dearly love the sub strap buckle (the met
/html/autox-cm/2001-04/msg00062.html (7,258 bytes)

17. Re: The Brake Rotor Project (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:12:20 -0500
Wow. Does that weight include the hats and the mounting hardware? Mark /// /// autox-cm@autox.team.net mailing list ///
/html/autox-cm/2001-02/msg00009.html (6,521 bytes)

18. Re: trailer questions (score: 1)
Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:46:23 -0500
I think some states (Ohio?) require brakes over 1500#. Don't know if that's just for trailers registered there, or any trailer passing through (I'm sure if it's the latter, lots of us are not in comp
/html/autox-cm/2001-01/msg00022.html (7,572 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu