Mail Archive Search: <+from:samandgreg@netins.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:samandgreg@netins.net: 61 ]

Total 61 documents matching your query.

1. Re: A Mod - Does it require enclosed bodywork??? (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 21:50:25 -0600; Hi Kevin: I think the following is what you are looking for. Appears that a minimal body is required. Hope that helps. Greg Scharnberg Ralt RT5 - BM 18.4 SPECIALS Cars not otherwise classified, which; /html/autox/2006-03/msg00004.html (7,891 bytes)
2. Re: [evolution-disc.] Ft Myers protests (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:18:22 -0600; Actually, the book says "A. Courses must be tight enough so that cars run the entire course in their lower gears. Speeds on straight stretches should not normally exceed the low 60's (mph) for the f; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00049.html (10,129 bytes)
3. Re: [evolution-disc.] Ft Myers protests (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:50:23 -0600; I would assume that the 83mph was from an unimpeachable source. How else could they make the decision that they made? Greg Scharnberg; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00051.html (9,662 bytes)
4. Re: event speed? (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:36:51 -0600; Our local region has lost many sites but never because of speed. The two usual causes are car/tire noise and a change in the lot owner's attitude. We have seen a lot of the "why should I let you use; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00054.html (7,427 bytes)
5. Re: [evolution-disc.] Ft Myers protests (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:41:24 -0600; IMHO, if you try to make absolute limits of some kind, then you need a positive way to enforce it. The only way I can think of would be to require that radar be used by a certified operator. You wou; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00055.html (8,754 bytes)
6. Re: [evolution-disc.] Ft Myers protests (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:08:26 -0600; Are you saying that the protest was aimed at the folks putting on Tours? Because, we sure ain't got no speed creep in Des Moines! :-) How will this protest change the attitude of those that choose t; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00059.html (9,358 bytes)
7. re: Ft Myers speeds (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:22:31 -0600; I still haven't heard from anyone about the speed measuring device that was used. I am still assuming it was radar. I certainly hope it was something much more accurate than a competitor's guess at h; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00066.html (8,956 bytes)
8. Re: [evolution-disc.] event speed? (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:08:28 -0600; I would agree that the rules are appropriate for Solo and clearly the problem was in the following of the rules. But, since the error was the SSS's, can you explain why the penalty was applied to the; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00069.html (10,956 bytes)
9. Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:09:24 -0600; Nicely written, and much appreciated. I have insert a couple of questions to better understand. Thanks. Greg Scharnberg How many Unprepared cars were entered in the event? You usually don't see very; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00080.html (10,247 bytes)
10. Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:41:32 -0600; Thanks again for the response. Take care. Greg; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00081.html (9,111 bytes)
11. Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:12:26 -0600; Or maybe they could have used the term "stock class vehicles". Hard to believe this was used as justification for the actions taken. Greg Scharnberg; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00089.html (10,859 bytes)
12. Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:01:51 -0600; Using your example, the term "stock and street prepared cars" is used in the first guideline. This makes it very clear that vehicles within certain class categories are to be used as yardsticks. In; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00090.html (10,979 bytes)
13. Curve size (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:50:34 -0600; Wow! That's huge. This kind of information should be available to SSSs. Not as a hard and fast rule, but it sure is helpful information since there is no reasonable way for an SSS to look at a turn a; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00104.html (7,415 bytes)
14. Re: [evolution-disc.] Video of Sunday's Fort Myer's Tour course (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:30:51 -0600; /html/autox/2006-02/msg00223.html (7,687 bytes)
15. Re: C5 for autocross (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 19:08:02 -0500; The best C5 for Solo is the Z06 and I believe it was only available with the 6 sp. All the folks on the Vette Net believe that the Z06 should be a 2002 or newer. The older ones had "issues". If not; /html/autox/2005-08/msg00007.html (8,385 bytes)
16. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: Complaint about STU ProSolo index (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:49:02 -0600; Did Jim buy Pro Solo from Bill Johnson? I thought Jim invented PAX (the series, not the index). Just wondering. Also, IMHO the SEB should get involved with Pro Solo. Greg Scharnberg; /html/autox/2005-02/msg00066.html (9,027 bytes)
17. Correction (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:51:40 -0600; Sorry! Meant to say should NOT get involved. Greg; /html/autox/2005-02/msg00067.html (6,569 bytes)
18. Re: Towing - Regular Van vs. Extended Van (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 12:12:12 -0600; I feel your pain with the van being totaled. We have used a 77 E350 460 ci Window Van, an 89 E350 460 ci Club Wagon and our current 97 V10 Heavy Duty Club Wagon and enjoyed all of them. My guess is; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00008.html (7,876 bytes)
19. RE: More van questions - BB vs. SB mileage, durability? (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 13:29:23 -0600; A couple of FWIWs. Ours (97 Ford V10 with 4 speed) doesn't indicate that you should bypass the OD. In 102K miles I have always used OD when towing our 6500-7000 pound 24' enclosed. Also, our 1977 46; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00040.html (8,477 bytes)
20. RE: Steve Johnson rubs elbows (score: 1): Author: Sam & Greg Scharnberg <samandgreg@netins.net>; Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:03:34 -0600; I'm sure he was talking about REAL racing! :-) Greg; /html/autox/2004-12/msg00050.html (7,245 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]