Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:spitlist@COX.NET: 540 ]

Total 540 documents matching your query.

301. RE: Spitfire differential with GT6 ring and pinion gears (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 17:19:30 -0700
I'll take your word for it. My only experience with the 3.27 was in trying to find a LSD for one and coming up empty. I ended up trying that POS Phantom Grip in it and discovering that it didn't work
/html/spitfires/2006-09/msg00025.html (9,591 bytes)

302. RE: GT6 rear ends (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 07:53:56 -0700
That is going to depend entirely on your transmission gearing. I am guessing that you are not going to try and hook a V8 up to a Spit gearbox, so you need to address the rear gearing after you analyz
/html/spitfires/2006-09/msg00027.html (7,206 bytes)

303. RE: Petrol (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 16:32:01 -0700
Anybody who thinks this sudden decrease in fuel prices is more than just an effort by the oil companies to keep the current Cabal in office is kidding himself. Joe Last Monday gas in my area of N. Vi
/html/spitfires/2006-09/msg00071.html (6,737 bytes)

304. Re: Door Mirrors for Spitfire MK3 1970 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 09:59:25 -0700
Your information is spot on. The right hand mirrow is obscured by the right windscreen post and only if you lean very far over to the right can you even see the imige in it. It does not adjust inward
/html/spitfires/2006-09/msg00087.html (8,475 bytes)

305. RE: GL5 in a Spitfire diff? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:05:10 -0700
True, I'm afraid. The stock carrier has parts made of brass and the sulfites in the GL5 will gradually eat up that and other gold colored metals. If you install a Quaife limited slip carrier, that co
/html/spitfires/2006-09/msg00107.html (7,614 bytes)

306. RE: Spitfire MKIII (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:45:55 -0700
It is pressed in. You can take it out by destroying it or perhaps use a big vice grip and try to work it out little by little if you want to save it. Joe Can anyone tell me how to get the emissions.
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00017.html (7,408 bytes)

307. Spitfire Database Updated (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 20:32:55 -0700
Hey folks, today the Spitfire database passed another milestone. There are over 11,000 cars now registered. http://members.cox.net/spitlist/ If yours is not there, please register it. Joe Curry == Th
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00024.html (6,632 bytes)

308. RE: sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:02:50 -0700
Thanks for you pithy comments, Alan. But All I can say is you can get bent. My advice about camber compensators comes form experience not profit incentive. I have seen the effects of driving an early
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00011.html (8,885 bytes)

309. RE: early/late rear springs, was sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:09:14 -0700
Barry, Apparently you didn't read the entire message. Higher up (above the recommendation about the CC) I did say that replacing the spring with a new one would solve the problem temporarily. It will
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00012.html (11,448 bytes)

310. RE: early/late rear springs, was sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:50:55 -0700
I overlooked that reply of Barry's the first time around and have to say this about that: I asked Kas Kastner about that and he said that he never recommended it and apparently doesn't think much of
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00014.html (9,867 bytes)

311. RE: New fully independent rear setup anyone?? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 19:32:58 -0700
"Joe" is very happy with his fully independent suspension setup on Tiny Tim. http://members.cox.net/spitlist/VetteDiff.htm Notice the big smiley face emoticon: :) Joe Speaking of rear end setups, ho
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00022.html (9,127 bytes)

312. Sagging suspension and other issues (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:52:05 -0700
I want to thank everyone who spoke up in my defense. I didn't know I had so many friends! :) I would like to say this and then I'll sit down. Yes, I sell camber compensators for Spitfires. I think I
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00028.html (9,797 bytes)

313. Re: Stock Tranny Gear Ratios MKI & II (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 11:41:47 -0700
1st 3.75:1 2nd 2.16:1 3rd 1.39:1 4th 1.0:1 R 3.75:1 == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00030.html (7,080 bytes)

314. RE: A quote on the swing-spring (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:31:44 -0700
That is an interesting point. Surely the Swing-Spring was more expensive to implement than the fixed spring, but probably less expensive than adding the camber compensator and certainly much less exp
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00037.html (9,612 bytes)

315. RE: A quote on the swing-spring (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 16:45:06 -0700
I for one would love to study those documents. They may finally answer a lot of questions I have had about the derivation of the Spitfire suspension. Joe Jim It's worth commenting that the Herald as
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00039.html (8,660 bytes)

316. RE: A quote on the swing-spring (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:43:02 -0700
I hope you are not saying that is the only reason Triumph widened the axles. It is not in keeping with the cost concerns in effect at the time. Since the shorter axles were used well into the MkIV m
/html/spitfires/2006-11/msg00043.html (10,419 bytes)

317. RE: sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:36:18 -0700
Unfortunately, it is "the nature of the beast". Your sag is due to the inherently bad design of the swing-spring rear suspension used on the Spits. The longer axles put a greater load on the weaker
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00065.html (8,810 bytes)

318. RE: sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:21:22 -0700
The longer axles started in mid 71, so they definitely DO apply here. In fact they are a major contributing factor in the sag problem. Joe Another possible factor is the longer axles which started in
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00069.html (8,657 bytes)

319. Re: sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:35:52 -0700
Actually it was Feb 73 when that change ocurred (serial number 50,000 accordin g to Thomason). I meant to type "Mid MkIV" production instead of Mid 71. And I totally agree that the longer axles were
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00075.html (11,523 bytes)

320. Re: sagging rear/advice (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 11:06:44 -0700
The 4 corners are all related in the action of the suspension. Increasing the front stiffness will lessen oversteer or induce understeer, as will softening the rear stiffness. But as for having anyt
/html/spitfires/2006-10/msg00081.html (8,904 bytes)

Current List: 301 - 320
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu