Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"objectionable\"\s+sponsorship\?\s*$/: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

1. "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:29:52 -0800
I have an opportunity to pick up some much-needed sponsorship cash for the upcoming season. Thing is, the company is an adult web site; not strictly a porn site, but certainly an adults-only sex-orie
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00303.html (8,390 bytes)

2. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Jones <axng4me@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:42:30 -0800 (PST)
Go for it. Now, if this was a fur coat manufacturer, or a cosmetic company, or a... patrick Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00304.html (9,047 bytes)

3. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:45:21 -0800
Dear Brooks, This sounds like a question for "Ask the Ace!" In other words, you've come to the right place. I get these questions all the time. And well, Brooks, I don't know what to tell you. All I
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00305.html (9,692 bytes)

4. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Carl Merritt <CMerritt@luminousnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:50:04 -0800
And...uh...what's their web site? I want to be sure and check to make sure I don't find it objectional... ;-) -Carl
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00306.html (10,055 bytes)

5. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "BAYLISS, E. J. (PBD)" <EJ.Bayliss@sbcdo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:59:12 -0800
Somehow I think Katie hit it right on the mark when she said "If you have to EJ Bayliss I have an opportunity to pick up some much-needed sponsorship cash for the upcoming season. Thing is, the compa
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00307.html (9,484 bytes)

6. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 17:57:55 -0800
That's true, Carl. As the Ace Reporter, Talley, I demand that you tell us the address of the site so the board can conduct a proper review. I mean, what the hell, it's after hours, right? Katie Kelly
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00308.html (10,669 bytes)

7. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:06:42 -0800
Ok, but don't say I didn't warn you. And don't blame me if you're hopelessly corrupted and scarred for life. And don't anyone even *think* of playing "oh, no, don't take it!" and then trying to score
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00309.html (12,109 bytes)

8. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:07:34 -0800
Well, thing is, not's not really my conscience so much as my complete lack of ability to guage what other people consider offensive. I routinely make my mom swoon and drink big glasses of water with
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00310.html (9,680 bytes)

9. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:09:20 -0800
I have reviewed the site. My involuntary reactions follow: Upon first opening the page (it took a moment to load), I saw, "Bondage.com." Interesting enough, I thought. Nice design. Then came the chic
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00311.html (10,758 bytes)

10. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:15:22 -0800
Do you have to just mention the name, or are there graphics involved. If it is the latter, I'd say go for it! It will give you a competitive advantage too since you'll be distracting your competitors
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00312.html (10,152 bytes)

11. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Talley, Brooks" <brooks@frnk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:20:39 -0800
It would be name only. Name/URL, since it's the same thing. -b ps: It's not?!
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00313.html (11,167 bytes)

12. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Weinstock" <weinstro@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 02:22:15
If the terms of the sponsorship require any exhibitionism, I think the most folks would kindly ask that you pass. Regards, Rob _________________________________________________________________
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00314.html (8,438 bytes)

13. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Kit Wetzler <kitwetzler@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:31:50 -0800
I'd love to have bondage.com's sponsorship, just for the laugh I'd get when the announcer got up and said, "And now, competing in his 97 BMW M3 is Kit Wetzler! Kit is here from Sunnyvale and hope to
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00315.html (9,370 bytes)

14. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:37:19 -0800
if you decide to pass on it my car is available! i am not proud. =) -james c a
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00316.html (10,068 bytes)

15. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Jerry Brown <jerbrown@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:30:20 -0800
Yeah, but it if you type it backwards, it's uh, ummm... nevowretni.com ... OK, nevermind. ;^) -jerry
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00317.html (9,069 bytes)

16. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Elmoizme@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:45:48 EST
Hey Brooks, Are you going to be tied up with these products while you're driving? That would be kewl cause then it would give me an advantage over you :) So if that's the case, I have no problems. Un
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00318.html (10,342 bytes)

17. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Au H. Nguyen" <aunguyen@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:46:52 -0800
Brooks, is your car going to say bondage.com all the time, or only at autocross? If it's all the time, you should be asking Miss Manners or somebody like that. If it's only autocross, do the people a
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00319.html (10,734 bytes)

18. Re: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "James Creasy" <jcre@mozart.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:57:01 -0800
i think its because in their market research, the word 'harness' appears on most autocross web sites. =) -james c the strictly the
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00320.html (11,279 bytes)

19. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: "Navid Kahangi" <navid@interwoven.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:20:56 -0800
Don't mean to pry, but it's killing me not to ask, how does one get a sponsorship from bondage.com?! --Navid Ok, but don't say I didn't warn you. And don't blame me if you're hopelessly corrupted and
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00322.html (13,106 bytes)

20. RE: "objectionable" sponsorship? (score: 1)
Author: Geoff Mohler <gemohler@www.speedtoys.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 19:55:38 -0800 (PST)
You could make it look like a 'duct tape' kinda thing..
/html/ba-autox/2001-01/msg00324.html (13,312 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu