Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\+\s+or\s+\-\s+$reliability\,\s+safety$\s+$Long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\+\s+or\s+\-\s+$reliability\,\s+safety$\s+$Long$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: + or - (reliability, safety) (Long) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 11:48:00 -0500; Message text written by Bob labuz deliver a generator that could not even keep up with the load? Is 19 amps the best they could get? or was it a cost issue? < As was already pointed out, it was good; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00274.html (8,532 bytes)
2. RE: + or - (reliability, safety) (Long) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 10:07:17 -0800; Except perhaps for when one is driving to work in the snow <g> All I can say is that you don't have to exceed it by very much, before a rebuilt generator will only last a few months. Thrown solder i; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00278.html (7,977 bytes)
3. RE: + or - (reliability, safety) (Long) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 17:09:31 -0500; Message text written by "Randall Young" capacity of the generator cannot be used to fully charge the battery, as the voltage set point will sag under heavy current output. < Another thing to keep in; /html/triumphs/2003-12/msg00291.html (7,025 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]